April 4, 2014

I decided I had to see this because all the press surrounding it was so damn hilarious.  I mean, this whole narrative about how the studio was upset because they thought they were getting a film they could market to conservative Christians and then it turns out the movie wasn’t, you know, at all Biblical, and I’m thinking, OF COURSE NOT, YOU IDIOTS, NOT WITH DARREN ARANOFSKY DIRECTING!!!!  This is the man who directed Pi, The Fountain, and Black Swan, for crying out loud.  This is a director known for cerebral, visually complex literary films.  What on God’s green Earth (no pun intended) made them think they were going to get a film evangelical audiences would flock to?  Then it started getting really decent reviews from the critical side of things, and I got even more curious.

So.  First off, there was no disclaimer assuring audiences that this isn’t a strict interpretation of the Bible, at least not on the version I saw.  Really, though, the thing was surprisingly faithful to the source material, in the way that most book-to-movie transitions are faithful.  I absolutely loved the first half of the movie, because it slotted cleanly into the category of Sword and Sorcery, with wizards and warlords and deep magic and pleading to long-vanished gods who may or may not be listening.  It reminded me, of all things, of the original Conan the Barbarian, and I mean that in the best possible way.  This is a genre we don’t see taken seriously very often in the movies, and this was a solid, gorgeous vision of different kind of Hyborian Age.  I believed the world, the despair and desperation.  I was there, I was sold.

And then it all fell apart.  They did that thing where they add a whole second movie on to the first one.

We got to the Deluge, and the aftermath, and I started checking my watch.  And checking.  And checking.  I thought, “Oh, here’s the start of the third act…. oh no, I guess this is the start of the third act….  No, maybe this is the start of the third act…  Or, maybe this movie has six acts.  Or maybe seven.  Oh dear…”

There’s actually a compelling storyline here where Noah has just gone completely stark raving crazy, which is understandable.  But it’s not very interesting, because he’s being crazy and threatening to kill babies, and everyone else is running around screaming and crying and not doing anything else, for like five hours (time dilation — it was only one but it felt like five).  What the story should have done is given all the other characters a spine.  So that the story then isn’t Noah Goes Crazy and Everybody Runs Around Crying.  The story is, Noah’s family points out that he isn’t the only one who gets to say what’s a miracle and what’s not.  Because that’s what killed the storyline for me:  the whole movie up to that point, miracles abound.  But this last miracle?  No, Noah isn’t buying it.  Made no damn sense.  My version? Would have taken fifteen minutes and everyone would be happy.

Anyway.  The last half went on too damn long, especially when the audience was already looking for the end of the movie when it all started.  Pacing, people.  And I fear it needs to be said that there wasn’t a single person of color in the entire film, not even in the swarming crowd mob scenes.

Oh, and what I think happened:  evangelicals weren’t upset that this movie wasn’t accurate to the Bible.  They were upset that there’s a beautiful surreal cinematic depiction of the formation of the universe and evolution in all its glory spread across billions of years.  It’s one of the really great things I loved about this movie, which has fallen firmly in my personal category of “I’d love to take a hatchet to this when the DVD comes out.”


3 Responses to “Noah”

  1. kyle Says:

    I got bored/turned off at the same midpoint, the flood. All of a sudden all of the non-Russell-Crowe characters became shallow wooden set-pieces, only there to react to Crowe. Up to the flood I was actually engaged. Towards end was starting to think of walking out.

    Your review of Pacific Rim last year got me to see a movie I would otherwise have ignored at the time, and It turned out to be one of the few movies last year I enjoyed.

  2. Tim Schmidt Says:

    I saw Noah last week. Like you I wasn’t all that concerned whether it was biblical or not. I did find it a little disconcerting that Noah’s choice (as he saw it) was to obey God and be a bigger monster than those being slain or disobey God and be a decent human being.
    It was beautiful visually, the acting was good but it just wasn’t a very well told story. I did like old Methusala though.


    I am so looking forward to seeing “Captain America” this weekend.

  3. Ted Fields Says:

    I gave it 3 stars. Like most, I really enjoyed the first half and found the last half a bit strange. As a 67 year old grandpa, sincerely hoping for purgatory, I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt though. Hey Carrie, when will they make a movie about Kitty Norville? Here’s a poem I wrote for her and you just now….Twi-Ted now from St Augustine, FL (formerly Kansas City)

    Midnight’s here, the late night hour.
    Time for Kitty’s wolfish power.
    Smart wit and charm, her stock in trade,
    calls in the night from friends she’s made.
    Calls in the night from friends she’s made,
    and trouble comes through lock or shade.
    Yet she is brave. Her heart is pure.
    If it’s trouble, she will endure!
    Midnight’s here, the late night hour.
    Time for Kitty’s wolfish power!

    You go girl! Twi-Ted

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.