I’m old enough to remember watching the Hulk TV series, which doesn’t really mean anything except I can laugh at the Lou Ferrigno cameo. Man, he’s taken good care of himself.

Oh, you want to know what I think about the film? Meh. It was…perfunctory. Nothing in it made me go “wow.” At least one scene made me go, “Oh, give me a break!” (Fuel is leaking from the helicopter! There are sparks! Oh noes, I wonder what happens next?!? ‘Splosion! Didn’t see that coming…)

I’ve been thinking a lot about what went wrong (in my opinion) with this film and find myself comparing it to “Iron Man,” which did just about everything right. Here’s what I’m thinking: “The Hulk” is muddled. The plot relies on a lot of cliche and hand waving to move itself along. The character arcs aren’t well defined. What this means is I don’t trust the filmmakers to tell the story, so instead of relaxing and enjoying the ride, I’m wondering how they’re going to screw up. “Iron Man” was a lovely scenic drive and “The Hulk” is a dark thickety path. It’s telling that my very favorite scene in the whole film was the very last one — that didn’t even have Bruce or Betty in it. (I can’t describe the scene — too spoilery. But if you’ve seen the film you know what I’m talking about.)

I want to add two scenes. No, not even scenes. A few lines of dialog. I can pick out three related character arcs: Banner doesn’t want power at all. Blonsky wants power and doesn’t care about control. General Ross wants absolute control over everything. This is a story about power: who has it, who wants it, and who deserves it. But the movie never brings these arcs to fruition. I think we need an exchange between Blonsky and Ross, when Blonsky is demanding more super-soldier treatment: Ross: “You’ve already had too much, you’ll lose control!” Blonsky: “I don’t care about control!” Ross is taken aback, and realizes he doesn’t control Blonsky. The audience realizes Blonsky isn’t a soldier — all those medals on his chest don’t mean anything, because he’s a madman. The other scene I would tweak: right before the last fight, in the helicopter: Ross has completely lost control, he’s rambling, Betty is begging him to do something, but all he can say is, “You don’t understand, that man is a monster, we don’t have anything that can stand up to it!” And nearby, Banner is staring into space, and he murmurs, “You have me.” Because he’s the only one who can actually control the power that everyone else craves.

That’s it. The pieces are already there. But the dialog never actually points to these pieces, the subtext behind all the action.  Sometimes you need to clear the path a little, to make it clear to the audience what’s happening. You can’t just have a lot of flashy action and expect the heart of the thing to shine through. “Iron Man” had heart.  This, not so much.

I haven’t even begun talking about how much I like Tim Roth and how I think it’s a shame he keeps getting cast in these thankless baddy roles. I’ll save that for another time. Also, I think Marvel Studios is in the midst of a hugely ambitious project, turning these films into a mosaic, with an interrelated story arc that promises to stretch over the next few years. I hope it works. That would rock.

Oh, and that very funny “You won’t like me when I’m…hungry” bit? Totally mine. I came up with that years ago. Just check the acknowledgments of “Kitty and the Midnight Hour.”

11 Responses to “in which I play script doctor for The Hulk”

  1. Rain Says:

    Can’t say too much without sounding lame. But, I’ve been reading this blog over the past several months, and like the first time I read Kitty and the Midnight Hour, continue to be pleasantly surprised. As of late, I’ve been an avid reader of your movie critiques, and have agreed with most of what you’ve said. So, Kudos. Not that I’m in a position to tell anyone what’s fabulous, and what isn’t, but everyone likes to hear that they’re great, right? That’s all I’m saying.

  2. Amie Stuart Says:

    *sigh* I am a HUGE Edward Norton fan and was really looking forward to this :(

    That said, I really liked the new Indy movie so who knows. Maybe I can watch and ignore the weak plotlines.

    Ooooo Ooooooooo Ooooooooo I picked up the last two Kitty books today–but no reading until I finish my WIP :(

  3. Joe Says:

    Ditto what Rain said.

    Haven’t seen the Hulk yet…but yep, I remember the TV show.

    I saw Lou Ferrigno on a DragonCon panel (with David Prowse, no less) last year.

    Both were kind, insightful and spun some wonderful tales. Yet neither did dialogue in their starring roles. Extra helpings of irony, anyone? Please and thank you.

    P.S. You, too, were awesome at DC, Carrie. Took many notes from your comments on writing. And thanks for signing my copy of Midnight Hour!

  4. carriev Says:

    Thanks for the comments. Sometimes I think I missed a calling as a movie reviewer. Mainly, I think movies are an easy way to talk about plot and story because they’re so compact. A book sprawls, and can get away with a lot of meandering. But a movie has to be tightly written and paced. Extraneous stuff tends to stand out.

    I like a lot of what Edward Norton has done (Fight Club, anyone?). But not everything. Part of my problem is I actually liked the last Hulk movie from a few years ago quite a bit. I think Eric Bana and Jennifer Connelly had more chemistry than Norton and Tyler.

    It’s not that Norton was bad in this Hulk, but I think three supremely talented actors — Norton, Roth, and Hurt — were rather wasted by a script that didn’t have much direction to it.

  5. Kristian Says:

    You know what frosts me about the fuel leaking from planes / helicopters? It doesn’t happen. They have self sealing tanks, because, believe it or not, aerospace engineers know that leaking fuel tanks are BAD. And, since military aircraft are shot at, the designers plan for holes in different parts. Go figure.

  6. chuck Says:

    I haven’t seen the film yet, but given the rumored script problems on this particular project, I wonder how many of your problems with the script are the result of excessive trimming on the final cut.

    There’s apparently 70-odd minutes missing from this cut of the film. Cut, apparently, to enhance the “HULK SMASH!” vibe, and diminish the “Banner talky-talky blah blah” feel, which is what the powers that be seems to think was the problem with Ang Lee’s Hulk, and not the “Hulk fights an amorphous, poorly lit CG blur for the last fifteen minutes” issue.

    I imagine that the inevitable extended, Director’s Cut DVD might solve a couple of the issues you raise.

    Here’s to hoping, anyway.

  7. carriev Says:

    Yeah, I’ve noticed this trend: it seems like when editors/directors have a choice between “character development” and “repetitive action”, they always cut character development in favor of repetitive action.

    If you cut out the goo monster in Ang Lee’s Hulk, it’s a fabulous movie.

  8. Jared Says:

    The Absorbing Man scene in the first Hulk always made sense to me: dad wants to absorb Bruce’s power/energy, only to find it too much for him to handle.

    The problem I had with this new Hulk is that virtually none of the major character decisions came out of…well, character. Instead, it feels all too obvious the characters do what they do because the script requires it, especially near the end. Why does Blonsky want to go the extra mile near the end to become the Abomination? It’s In The Script. Why does Banner suddenly decide, with little difficulty, to Hulk out one last time? IITS.

    I also just missed Sam Elliott as General Ross.

  9. carriev Says:

    I really heart Sam Elliott…

    Those two points are exactly what I was trying to address with my little dialog fixes. I recently heard a phrase in a writing workshop: “Hang a lantern on it.” Which means, the info is there, but not highlighted. Point it out to the reader/audience. In movies, the only way to do that is with imagery or dialog, and The Incredible Hulk utilized neither.

    Lee’s Hulk: Here’s my fix: Daddy Bruce goes into the Gamma Ray machine, intending to become Absorbing Man. It fails (the whole point was Bruce’s genetic makeup allowed him to survive!). Intercut the picture of the frog exploding from early in the movie. He’s dead. The film ends with the Hulk falling from the plane, Betty being told he’s dead, and then Bruce walking the earth like Kane from Kung Fu…

  10. Chris Says:

    Could you add a scene where Blonsky shaves? (sorry, my inner military brat showing)


  11. [...] Even with such a cheesy plot/explanation this could have been a really great movie (if Whalberg’s wife had really cheated, then been in danger and he had to decide to save her…or not–yeah! If the event had spread further than the NE Seaboard and Whalberg had to help stop it? Yeah…cuz you know all HS Science Teachers are secretly Nobel Prize winners. If they had actually gone to save John Leguizamo and his wife…..sure. Id’a bought it–maybe. Sadly it fell far short in character AND external conflict. I almost wish I’d wasted my money on The Hulk. [...]


Leave a Reply